| Painting is dead. When I first came upon
this statement, I embraced it as a challenge. Challenge and risk taking
are what fosters the creative evolution. Painting is far from dead, but
if it is to continue to be a vital component in the arts, if it is to
continue to evolve, then painting must be taken to new dimensions. I have
taken this as literally as possible in my three-dimensional relief paintings,
the development of which are integrally connected to two-dimensional contour
and illusionistic painting devices.
Relief has been a part of image making since humans began to make images,
with examples found as early as the Paleolithic era. Traditionally it
has been recognized as a form of sculpture, however the concept of relief
is primarily pictorial because relief, like painting or drawing, is founded
on the emergence of an image from a flat surface. Contemporary painters
have made use of this attribute by utilizing modes of relief in their
paintings, adding bulges or layered materials for actual depth. The inclusion
of the third dimension by modern artists has led to new interpretations
of relief in painting, relaxing the definition of relief as a purely sculptural
term.
Expanding on this idea, I have developed a way to release painting from
the physical frame. I have created a unique relief painting support made
of polystyrene covered in a soft cotton ground. The individually constructed
and shaped forms interconnect, somewhat like a relief puzzle. The connections
create an implied line consistent with the edges of the shapes in the
original two-dimensional contour design. Through saturated, layered color,
the illusions used to create a sense of depth in two-dimensional painting
are then used on the forms. These covered and painted forms are sometimes
further enhanced through the application of flock to the surface. By being
removed from a physical frame, these paintings, no longer contained, are
allowed to visually expand into space extending across walls as well as
outward toward the viewer. The pieces created in this manner can be seen
below or at www.isu.edu/art. Scroll down to the Davis Gallery and click
on ‘Painting in Three Dimensions by Sarah Krank.
click to enlarge |
 |
| Figure 1 |
|
Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending
a Staircase, No. 2, 1912 |
It seemed natural to offer this advancement to the Nude Descending a
Staircase, No. 2 (Fig. 1) by Marcel Duchamp.
Duchamp’s Nude had been created to show the dynamic motion of a young
lady as she descended the stairs, but the painting remained on a flat surface,
the woman described in mostly hard, angular lines. I wanted to take the
figure and allow her to emerge as a three-dimensional woman while keeping
the intensity and power of her movements. I wanted to combine those hard,
angular lines with the organic feel that Duchamp only suggests. To keep
the feeling of the force of her body as she moved downward, I needed her
to be big–nearly nine feet tall.
I named her Nude Redescending a Staircase (Fig.
2). She begins at a physical distance, the forms in the upper left
corner of the work extending only about an inch off the surface. Then,
as she descends (or redescends) she gradually increases into the viewers
space coming forward a full 22 inches. The oblique angles allow her to
have an abstracted actual figure with illusions of light moving and playing
across her form. Each individual piece is slightly rounded. Even the hardest
edges have a gentleness about them thanks to the cotton ground.
click to enlarge |
| |
 |
|
| Figure 2 |
|
Sarah C. Krank, Nude Redescending
a Staircase
|
I wanted to honor Duchamp’s design as well as the fury it created,
so I stayed as true to his color choices as possible. I created a canvas
back drop for the nude so that the golden and green hues could continue
to stand out against the dark background. The relief pieces are attached
to a wooden form cut to resemble the stairs in the original painting.
This is hung over the canvas and the paint on the back drop continues
over this support. Last, additions of small pieces of old wooden shingles
were added to the surface in homage to the suggestion that the Duchamp
work looked like an explosion in a shingle factory.
The tradition of incorporating the knowledge of other artists by referencing
their work in your own style is invaluable. Marcel Duchamp’s Nude
Descending is an enduring landmark, a masterpiece. To have the opportunity
to stand on the shoulders of this giant of the art world has enabled me
to transcend the visual plane of this painting into three dimensions and
begin to incorporate Duchamp’s geometry into my organic world.
click to enlarge |
| |
|
| Figure 3
|
|
Sarah C. Krank, Constructed
Relief Painting IV - Iris |
|
| |
|
| Figure 4
|
|
Sarah C. Krank, Constructed
Relief Painting III - Nude |
|
 |
| Figure 5 |
| Sarah C. Krank, Constructed
Relief Painting I - Montana |
Fig(s). 1
©2005 Succession Marcel Duchamp, ARS, N.Y./ADAGP, Paris. All rights
reserved. |